Alright... Let's get back on subject... Was Glenn H. a peedoh, or what?

Quote from: Goosebumples on August 10, 2026, 12:03:21 AM
Quote from: Barnacle Billy on August 10, 2026, 12:01:14 AM
Quote from: Goosebumples on August 09, 2026, 11:59:56 PM
Quote from: Barnacle Billy on August 09, 2026, 11:58:38 PMNo!
:laugh: Suppose yer resolute, if anything
I just hate... and I mean HATE... Gubmint sanctioned m'urder... Right!
If thats the case, I'm certain star wars would be a healthier specialist interest for you  :laugh:
Sorry to disappoint brah... Me no look at TV,  never

Quote from: Black Shepherd Carnage on August 09, 2026, 11:14:48 PM
Quote from: son of the Morrigan on August 09, 2026, 09:05:01 PMThe fact that the vaccine produces spike protiens is not proof that the vaccine is effective.

I didn't make that claim. The claim you made, about the vaccine causing cancer, is that the spike protein the vaccine makes the organism produce is carcinogenic. All I said is that, if that is the case, then the spike proteins found all over the virus you also want to claim is next-to-harmless and therefore didn't require a vaccine in the first place (despite the fact that the lad you're telling us to listen to about mRNA vaccines being dangerous proposed a vaccine for it himself) would also be carcinogenic. In which case the respective cancer causing potentials of the virus and the vaccine would have to be epidemiologically compared and weighed up against each other. And this is just a glimpse of the true complexity of the issue.


Sorry man, you didn't claim that, read ya wrong there.

Ya do know the vaccine spike protein and the covid 19 spike protein are different and distinguishabie yeah?

The spike protein found in tumors is from the vaccine, not natural infection.

And you'r right, it is complex as fuck, and obviously I'm no expert, I'm a bogman.

Quote from: son of the Morrigan on August 10, 2026, 01:18:49 AMYa do know the vaccine spike protein and the covid 19 spike protein are different and distinguishabie yeah?

I do, yeah. And carcinogenic claims have been made of both. And anti-carcinogenic claims too (yup, of both the virus spike protein and the vaccine generated one).

As for Dealglish, I'm pretty sure you do see the potential problem with a man who has a direct vested interest in one technology succeeding also being the man claiming, to an audience of politicians he wants to see running the country, that his main competition technology should be banned.

#3859 August 10, 2026, 06:55:32 PM Last Edit: August 10, 2026, 06:57:15 PM by Barnacle Billy


No doubt made by a clown who wouldn't know a p-value from his pee-hole.

Quote from: Black Shepherd Carnage on August 10, 2026, 10:14:23 AM
Quote from: son of the Morrigan on August 10, 2026, 01:18:49 AMYa do know the vaccine spike protein and the covid 19 spike protein are different and distinguishabie yeah?

I do, yeah. And carcinogenic claims have been made of both. And anti-carcinogenic claims too (yup, of both the virus spike protein and the vaccine generated one).

As for Dealglish, I'm pretty sure you do see the potential problem with a man who has a direct vested interest in one technology succeeding also being the man claiming, to an audience of politicians he wants to see running the country, that his main competition technology should be banned.


Ah yes, "dr." Fouci of course had no vested intrest at all, or Pfizer. Not a penny to be made for the poor auld hoors. Nothing on their minds but concern for the health of the general public.

And needless to say, all we have to do is look  back at their track record to see what saintly, wonderful people they are.

Cop on lad.

As per your habit, you're presuming things I haven't said or done: defend Fauci or Pfizer.

Quote from: Black Shepherd Carnage on August 10, 2026, 07:15:09 PMAs per your habit, you're presuming things I haven't said or done: defend Fauci or Pfizer.

You bought up vested interests man.
Sauce for goose - sauce for gander.

You're presuming things I haven't said or done: suggested you defend fucki or fuckzer.

You said: "Go listen to Dealglish."
I didn't say: "Go listen to Fauci."

So vested interests of Dealglish are relevant to the discussion, Fauci's less so...since no one here is defending him. I'm defending the basic science (virology, epidemiology, etc.) done by basic researchers like me, earning basic wages quite possibly/probably lower than whatever you pull in.

Gawd forbid someone would have a different opinion, or indeed world view to you, eh boy?

Science ain't a question of opinion boy. Facts don't care about your feelings, remembah  ;)

Quote from: Black Shepherd Carnage on August 10, 2026, 07:35:37 PMYou said: "Go listen to Dealglish."
I didn't say: "Go listen to Fauci."

So vested interests of Dealglish are relevant to the discussion, Fauci's less so...since no one here is defending him. I'm defending the basic science (virology, epidemiology, etc.) done by basic researchers like me, earning basic wages quite possibly/probably lower than whatever you pull in.

Ah, so you have a vested intrest yourself.

To be honest I assumed ya had all along but I didn't want to get personal.
Who's funding your research?

Yeah, trust the $cienc€