Last I heard, he was weeping over the tributes to Glen Hansard and wondering where he'd gone wrong  :P


I read a study that suggested there was a 50% chance Glen had noncy tendencies.

It had a 50% margin of error though , so I dont know what to make of it.

#3918 August 12, 2026, 08:31:57 PM Last Edit: August 12, 2026, 08:35:03 PM by Black Shepherd Carnage
Nah, you've got that upside down too man  :P  50% of his own age was Hansard's margin of error with young wans  :laugh:

Quote from: Black Shepherd Carnage on August 12, 2026, 05:12:20 PMLast I heard, he was weeping over the tributes to Glen Hansard and wondering where he'd gone wrong  :P
Jajajajajajajajajaja  :laugh:
How'd I not see this earlier  :laugh:

Quote from: Black Shepherd Carnage on August 12, 2026, 08:31:57 PMNah, you've got that upside down too man  :P  50% of his own age was Hansard's margin of error with young wans  :laugh:

 :laugh:  :laugh:  I stand corrected.

Heres a question for ya man, it might be a stupid question, and I'm not sure do I know what I'm on about myself. (Nothing new there says you)

It occurs to me that it might seem like a question designed to ellicit an answer that I will throw back at ya later.
It is not, and I will not.

Feel free to call me a tit and not answer it.

To what extent does ones personal discernment affect how they interpret a study?

For instance, if two scientists of equal qualification and standing read a study, and draw entirely opposing conclusions, how does one decide which is right?
Or are they both right?

These studies wreck my fucking head.

Again, don't answer if ya don't want.

Ah lads.

While fouci was on telly saying the vaccine was totally safe for pregnant women, and urging them to take it, he was saying in text messages that he was aware there was an increased risk of miscarriage.

Pregnant women lads.

Christ above.

#3922 Today at 12:11:09 AM Last Edit: Today at 12:13:20 AM by Barnacle Billy
UPDATE: Former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield just publicly said vaccinating pregnant women for COVID was a MASSIVE "MISTAKE"

"It was a MISTAKE to vaccinate pregnant women!"

"827 pregnancies in individuals that received the vaccine...115 miscarriages or spontaneous abortions," he told Katie Pavlich



"Are you saying the babies are having heart attacks in the womb from the Covid Vaccines"—— YES!

The warning signs were there... it was ignored.

Medical experts tried to sound the alarm... they were censored.

Groups of moms on facebook tried to say something was very wrong... they were shut down.

There is no forgiveness to be had. There are no excuses to justify what they've done. I am pissed. I am angry. I am beyond talking to at this point. All of these MF's need to be held accountable.


And I remember Tony "cervical check" Holohan saying the same thing at his stupid fucking press briefings.

I remember being beside myself with rage about it and being told I was crazy.

Pregnant women lads.

Quote from: Barnacle Billy on Today at 12:11:09 AM"827 pregnancies in individuals that received the vaccine...115 miscarriages or spontaneous abortions," he told Katie Pavlich

Here's the study those precise figures are taken from (took 10 seconds to find):
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983

QuoteAmong 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) were pregnancy losses and 712 (86.1%) were live births (mostly among participants vaccinated in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported. Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic.


Conclusions
Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.

Those follow-up studies have since been done and found no increased risk. All your "rage" (aka inability to control your emotions) is simply clouding your capacity to judge rationally.

#3926 Today at 12:51:39 AM Last Edit: Today at 02:29:20 PM by Black Shepherd Carnage
Do I think there should have been more transparency all along? Yes, I've always said that. Are both of your conclusions regarding what was known and unknown regarding pregnancy risk a distortion of the truth? Also yes.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/fauci-texts-reveal-miscarriage-concern-201902110.html

Man.

The point here is'nt whether the vaccines do, or do not cause misscarriage.

The point is that Fauci thought they did, and still went out in public and said they didn't.

I'm sorry man, but that is by any metric, and this is not a word I use often, evil.

Jan 25 2021: Fauci text - "I asked around a bit more and another issue came up that you need to be aware of. Since many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the 2nd dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester"

Jan 26 2021: Fauci wrote that pregnant women had not been allowed in the trials but that following emergency authorization, "a large number (more than 10,000) pregnant women have been vaccinated. No issues have arisen." He added that animal toxicology studies had raised no red flags and that federal and medical authorities allowed pregnant women to choose vaccination.

"CDC guidance published before the exchange likewise said no pregnancy safety data were available and that eligible pregnant women could choose vaccination after considering the risks with their medical team."

Feb 3 2021: "The FDA, as part of the typical follow-up you have following the initial issuing of an EUA, have found, thus far, and we've got to be careful, but thus far, no red flags about that, about pregnant women"

You're leaping from "he raised a potential theoretical possibility" to "he thought they caused miscarriages". Your sources are, as I've been saying, to be trusted even less than Fauci if that's the conclusion they're pushing based on that evidence.

It would appear you are correct man.

I was duped, I did let my emotions get the better of me and failed to do my due diligence.

You'r like spock ya cunt.

I concede that point, and do so happily, with a little bit of my faith in humanity restored.

Thanks man.