Are we all fucked?

[Carnage]

Must have been snapped up, it's not there anymore.

[Black Shepherd Carnage]

Ah, pity. Could have been a perfect place for someone thinking of doing a bedroom suicidal black metal project.

[Yung Led Zeppelin]

There was someone listing a fucking 2 bed in Turner's Cross in the classifieds in work today for €3,150 a month. Over 3. Fucking. Grand. They were quite defensive when people simply commented the price was beyond insane.

[astfgyl]

I wonder which TD owns that one

[Caomhaoin]

3 Grand+? To rent? In Turners Cross?

These cunts have no shame whatsoever. That is approximately 4 mortgage payments on my gaff.

[Yung Led Zeppelin]

Exactly. Laughing at the notions of it but it's pure cuntology.

[astfgyl]

https://twitter.com/SHomburg/status/1659778679734521856?t=hpuGHZj0M3kTm87AfWPBig&s=19

Here's more cuntology. Well ok tbf we have moved on significantly in a scientific sense since then in that someone has found a way to tax you for that shapeshifting bold climate change. That's a significant scientific shift if I've ever seen one! And when I say shift I don't mean movement, I mean akin to getting the shift and then getting rode by The Science after and they keep shushing in your ear when you scream.

So which is worse, freezing or burning?

Or would the avarice involved in thinking we can either convince people we can either cause it or fix it with our current level of knowledge of the interaction of infinite interconnected systems (any one of which could cause any number of impossible to predict outcomes), trump all possible outcomes? I think maybe so and here we are

[Black Shepherd Carnage]

[astfgyl]

Which ones were better funded? Can you do a breakdown by how many pigeons were shot in each year of the analysis? Talking shit and you know it.

Wtfhappenedinnineteenwhatever.com

[Black Shepherd Carnage]

The question you should be asking yourself is who, in 1979, was funding Leonard Nimoy predicting an ice age, as opposed to global warming, on television. Or maybe it was just typical tv ratings sensationalism.

Either way, I don't really know what you're trying to conclude from a section from a mass media tv show, but even in 1979, the consensus was clearly heading in one direction.

[astfgyl]

The question you should be asking yourself (now that we're full enough of ourselves to think we're too clever for the questions that the other lads are asking, even though we don't know the answer) is:

Which prediction was worth more in terms of gross profit?

When it's cold it's cold. When it's warm you owe money. Wow how surprising. Load of bollix the whole premise.

The term playing god comes to mind but then that notion will be wasted on the politically indoctrinated because they have already been captured.

How much money do you reckon it's going to cost to fix the earth's climate at a temperature where you won't have to pay or lose some of your freedom for it?   

[Black Shepherd Carnage]

Worth more to who? A prediction of an ice age was worth lots to people in the business of burning stuff. That's not controversial, right? A prediction, in the 1970s, of global heating... I don't know who that was profitable to back then tbh.

[astfgyl]

Profitable to whoever offered the solution.

Have you ever read The Sneetches? Honestly like

[Black Shepherd Carnage]

I've never read any Dr.Seuss as it happens 

What I'm saying is that, in 1979, I don't know who was offering solutions, profitable solutions, to an impending global warming event. But I do know who was in the business of heating stuff. And I know that they had more money than anyone else at the time. Do you have any idea about who stood to make money by claiming an impending global warming event back then? Today it's easy to point to lots of companies and interests, but back then, genuinely, I can't think of any. Only because I've never thought about it before. So?

[astfgyl]

Grand no bother. Basically the whole thing is The Sneetches anyway. It might be warming, it might be cooling but regardless there's a whole selection of shit mofos who are going to sell you both the problem and the solution and neither will be either.

The meta analysis scientific method can do whatever as far as I'm concerned because it's too compromised to do any good in its current iteration. You might think different and fair enough sometimes but it's all gone balls