Good topic?


Give it a go anyways.

I seen today the absolute filth bag that assaulted Alanna Quinn in Ballyfermot got a completely lenient four year sentence today. Every concession possible was given to the perpetrator.

The judge for the case was Martin Nolan who has a track record for being sympathetic to scum.

The max sentence for a case like this is life, the minimum 10-14 years but this piece of dirt walked away with a four year sentence because he wrote a letter of apology.

The system here is fundamentally flawed.

Is that yer man who put her eye out? Fucking scumbag, they should take his eye out.

Where he's going they'll hopefully be putting things in. Little cunt.

QuoteIs that yer man who put her eye out? Fucking scumbag, they should take his eye out.

Yeah, he's ruined the girls life. 4 years for that is appalling.

Why are the sentences here so short?

I say we just rename it the Philip Nolan thread because it'll invariably be him who gives the most distracting sentences.

I'd like to see what sentence he'd have given to Barbie

Ive heard mention of this guy.
Wonder what he would give to someone who broke into his house and buggered his family!

I'll try find it but recently read a synopsis of his greatest hits in terms of sentencing, it's unbelievable. The scary thing was there are multiple instances of him giving non custodial sentences to individuals caught with substantial amounts of child pornography.


"Young people do stupid things". I think it goes way past stupid to heinous.



I have never understood the concurrent sentencing thing, Can someone explain it ? It's akin to saying to the criminal sure commit three crimes and we will only sentence you for one of them. The sentencing will get stricter if a senior minister or judge is a victim of crime, or someone close to them is. The issue will have to be looked at then.

I'll explain it no bother.

The law is a joke.

First thing on the whole forum that we all agree on.

Bookmark this shit ye absolute gimps

Nolan cuts the sentence and lists all the "mitigating factors", but won't mention the fact Lyons and co have so far refused to identify the fourth guy involved (the one who actually hit her in the eye).
I suppose Lyons is lucky, if he'd been importing garlic as well, he'd have gotten another few years added on to the sentence.

Quote from: astfgyl on March 25, 2023, 01:10:58 AMI'll explain it no bother.

The law is a joke.

First thing on the whole forum that we all agree on.

Bookmark this shit ye absolute gimps

No idea who I was calling gimps there. Have thought about it several times and still nothing. Ah well  :laugh:


Quote from: Mower Liberation Front on March 25, 2023, 06:44:52 AMNolan cuts the sentence and lists all the "mitigating factors", but won't mention the fact Lyons and co have so far refused to identify the fourth guy involved (the one who actually hit her in the eye).
I suppose Lyons is lucky, if he'd been importing garlic as well, he'd have gotten another few years added on to the sentence.

Seriously though what in the name of god is that Nolan fella at? Does he think some of them are cute or what the fuck

I heard somewhere and I'm not sure how true it is that the lad was charged with assault causing harm which carries a maximum of five years. In this case the lad should have been charged with assault causing serious harm. If that's true the blame rests with the DPP on this one. Although it's far from Nolan's first rodeo.