The Donald vs Big Tech

[pete]

He was crystal clear here imo

"I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. ... Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything."

[Ollkiller]

Just saw Michael wolff released his audio tapes interviewing Jeffrey Epstein where he talks about being Trumps best friend for 10 years.

[astfgyl]

Why don't I go find examples of the other lad being coherent and run those through the analysis like?

Good luck finding his coherent examples.

Funny as that is, you know exactly what I meant. Let's not be too pedantic about which candidate is the greater retard

[astfgyl]

He was crystal clear here imo

"I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. ... Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything."

Thank god being an absolute wanker makes the other candidate less incoherent!!

You should run that through the Black Shepherd coherency analysis tool.

Be careful though...

Sometimes the answer is that the questioner is the tool

[pete]

Be careful though...

Sometimes the answer is that the questioner is the tool

Its been a long day, what's this mean?

[Yung Led Zeppelin]

Seems like a Trump quote

[astfgyl]

It's actually a Harris quote

[mickO)))]

Just saw Michael wolff released his audio tapes interviewing Jeffrey Epstein where he talks about being Trumps best friend for 10 years.

And after all they have thrown at him even in just the last year they sat on this and didn't try to use it against him? If they had anything on Trump and Epstein it would have been revealed long ago.

[Black Shepherd Carnage]

...unless it can't be revealed without spilling over on to certain others (say, the Clintons) 

[mickO)))]

I think they could very easily spin that as they have done with other things in the past because something like being properly involved with Epstein is one of the few things that would easily turn everyone against him.

[Black Shepherd Carnage]

A house of cards is a house of cards, and if the likes of Clinton, Dershowitz, Gates, etc., are at risk of tumbling then that is not a tablecloth they'll be willing to have anyone pull on, even if it meant bringing down Trump. Apart from Prince Andrew, have any other cases been properly looked into? Not so far as I know.

[Ollkiller]

I think they could very easily spin that as they have done with other things in the past because something like being properly involved with Epstein is one of the few things that would easily turn everyone against him.

Well in the released tapes epstein talks about trump being his best friend for 10 years. Is that properly involved?

[Mooncat]

I think he's objectively worse in much the same way that someone who shits themself is objectively worse to have to deal with than someone who pisses themself 

Throw up a verbatim transcript of the most incoherent thing she's ever come out with there and we can ask a text analyzer to compare.

I'm sure you already know this, and I do think your contesting with the pro-Trumpers is really valuable on here, but overall it's not really about Trump or Harris for them. I doubt that realistically they give even the remotest shit about Trump, and even less about Harris. They're merely avatars for what they represent (similar to when it was Trudeau they all hated and suddenly Canadian politics and policy was important to them). People tend to react to their values being tested or challenged. Their core values. Analyzing text is a hiding to nothing. It's obvious Trump is a loon, but if he represents people's values then they'll support him no matter what he does, as we've seen over the last 8yrs. The more uncomfortable discussion would be why do you support Trump. And nothing to do with American politics. Is it because of your issues with immigrants? Do you oppose feminism etc etc. There are much more uncomfortable but useful conversations to be had. Even if just with themselves.

[Black Shepherd Carnage]

If I manage to communicate that any piece of speech which stays on one topic--no matter how otherwise simplistic or repetitive--can never be objectively considered more incoherent than a piece of speech which staggers from topic to topic with no logical connections (while also being simplistic and repetitive)... then I'll have accomplished something 

[mickO)))]

A house of cards is a house of cards, and if the likes of Clinton, Dershowitz, Gates, etc., are at risk of tumbling then that is not a tablecloth they'll be willing to have anyone pull on, even if it meant bringing down Trump. Apart from Prince Andrew, have any other cases been properly looked into? Not so far as I know.

Andrew wasn't even looked into properly what was it he got a fine or something that his Mammy paid off for him. Then you have everything that went on during the Maxwell trial and her being convicted of trafficking to nobody.

I think they could very easily spin that as they have done with other things in the past because something like being properly involved with Epstein is one of the few things that would easily turn everyone against him.

Well in the released tapes epstein talks about trump being his best friend for 10 years. Is that properly involved?

When was the interview from before or after Epstein was arrested? Did he mention the Clintons or Bush in the tapes? I have seen the paintings he had hanging in his house of Bill Clinton and George Bush or was it just specifically Trump that was mentioned? Also I can't remember exactly what as it has been so long since I looked at any of the Epstein stuff but didn't Trump have some part to play in Epstein originally being caught? Just seems like perfect timing for this news to come out a few days before the election especially given how Wolff feels about Trump.