If you're going to invite the media over to your hospital to showboat the staff getting injections, you'd probably want to make sure  the lad who's administering the shot actually knows what he's doing.

https://metro.co.uk/2020/12/16/hospital-accused-of-faking-covid-vaccine-for-tv-after-viewers-spotted-syringe-plunger-that-didnt-move-13763415/

It's a shot for a TV news piece. If you've ever been part of one you know all kinds of hilarious shit gets done for b-roll. There is absolutely nothing to this.

Honestly, are people's brains that fuccking melted at this stage.

 :laugh:


Macron has tested positive now.

Might want to link that high-larious picture in some kind of NSFW way man.

#2344 December 17, 2020, 09:54:01 AM Last Edit: December 17, 2020, 09:56:22 AM by Kurt Cocaine
Attention: the above post ^^^ comes with a NSFW warning....


Or you could grow a pair....  :abbath:

























(see what I did there?)  :laugh:

Quote from: Black Shepherd Carnage on December 17, 2020, 09:43:51 AM
Macron has tested positive now.

Might want to link that high-larious picture in some kind of NSFW way man.
Errr, it's a medical photo warning of the dangers of rushed out vaccines.

Her name is Sukki Sukki by the way....

https://twitter.com/i/events/1339571301783134210

Yeah imagine that, and yet the headlines say it shows what we could have after we all take the vaccine even though they don't have one. Hmmmm?

Of course the whole world hasn't been played like a fiddle or anything and economic havoc hasn't been wreaked on every western nation, nothing like that. Imagine, the very city where they discovered asymptomatic transmission wasn't a thing in a sample of 10 million people, is first back doing whatever they like.

Don't forget to charge any relatives invited round for Christmas dinner the magic €9 and all will be fine.
Better still, only invite family members and friends that work in supermarkets and shops round for the tukky & ham consumption.

Quote from: astfgyl on December 17, 2020, 07:18:38 PM
https://twitter.com/i/events/1339571301783134210

Yeah imagine that, and yet the headlines say it shows what we could have after we all take the vaccine even though they don't have one. Hmmmm?

Of course the whole world hasn't been played like a fiddle or anything and economic havoc hasn't been wreaked on every western nation, nothing like that. Imagine, the very city where they discovered asymptomatic transmission wasn't a thing in a sample of 10 million people, is first back doing whatever they like.

Nowhere in the West responded the way China did though. There was a lot of moaning about China acting slowly, but when they did act, they acted hard, really hard. Much more than any of the comparatively mild measures that are making you feel so violated. And now you want to compare their results with ours in the West? Sorry, that's a real case of wanting to have your fortune cookie and eat it.

You don't really believe that though, although the argument itself is seemingly sound enough.

It's one thing being paranoid about everything but it's equally a thing insisting there is nothing to see here.

It's true though, China were forcing people to stay indoors, and in the west you're asking people to wear a mask and instead they congregate in thousands screaming "MUH FREEDOM"

Quote from: astfgyl on December 17, 2020, 09:18:15 PM
You don't really believe that though

I really do believe that.

#2353 December 18, 2020, 09:32:58 AM Last Edit: December 18, 2020, 09:52:00 AM by astfgyl
Ok so China's own mass testing of 10 million people showed that asymptomatic transmission wasn't a thing, but only after flooding the internet with horror images and stories and influencing the masses in every country worldwide to beg for a lockdown due to the suggestion that this virus was 10 times more deadly than what it was. Then the rest of the world, clever as they are, decided to lock down over and over to wait for a vaccine to save them even though there has never been an effective one against the SARS-type virus. Lo and behold all records are broken and here it is, but it doesn't stop transmission, only supposedly and with some very soft results lessens the severity in 94% of people in the study group (who also were only accepted with no underlying conditions and at a young age). And don't forget that it was already circulating last year, well before Wuhan/Hubei lockdown and the same level of quarantine was not introduced in the rest of China. Now, would logic not suggest that it would have gotten out to most of China during that time before discovery just as it did the rest of the world?? No? Ok. Yet look at their flatlined graph of cases since May compared to everywhere else. How did they stop transmission all over the rest of China without that lockdown? We know the cat was out of the bag long before then do we not (see sewage samples from Italy/Brazil going back to last autumn)? Now Wuhan is back to absolute normal (no masks, no distancing, no lockdown) while the rest of the world continues to struggle with the notion of containing something that is almost certainly impossible to contain, and all without the magic vaccine. Imagine that for an outcome. And there we were, 2 weeks to flatten the curve 9 months ago to keep the hospitals from getting overwhelmed which they never did.

As I already mentioned, thinking that there is a secret cabal hell bent on enslavement of all peoples of the earth is no worse than thinking that all massive corporations and financial interests are benevolent and we are all in this together while the richest people in the world get even richer and more powerful off the back of this thing. Disaster Capitalism anyone? Nah of course not. Massive wealth transfer from small business to big? Certainly not! New Normal declared before anyone knew the outcome? You betcha!!

And it's MY freedom, or what little of it I have left. It reminds me of that quote knocking around saying those who would give up their freedom for security deserve neither. Of course that's a bit extreme but it has a point.

Oh and by the way, the vaccine is guaranteed to work now that the WHO have published the guidelines for what is a case in the last few days and guess what...? It states that positive PCR results should now only be considered valid in conjunction with clinical symptoms (https://www.who.int/news/item/14-12-2020-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users). So pandemic over then. Actually, here's the relevant quote for the lazy:
QuoteConsider any positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) or negative results (SARS-CoV-2 not detected) in combination with specimen type, clinical observations, patient history, and epidemiological information.
Well they said another few months, until enough people have taken the vaccine that doesn't prevent transmission. Cool. We won! We did it together!

Fuck sake lads.

Here: have a look at this https://sciencebusiness.net/covid-19/news/world-leading-virologist-joins-new-eu-covid-19-advisory-team

Look behind him there. Yep the WEF. Now where have I heard of them before? Oh yeah it's the crowd pushing The Great Reset and telling us things can never go back to how they were. What a coincidence. Very handy pandemic there, so lucky it came along at just the right time.

The jury is still very much out on asymptomatic transmission. Logically, it's expected to be lower, since no symptoms means less spontaneous expulsion of infected fluids - saliva, mucus, etc., - either directly towards a third party or indirectly via hand to surface to hand contact, etc. Also, the count on how many infected people are actually "asymptomatic" has been seriously reviewed. Since symptoms can be merely cold-like or mild flu-like, someone with sniffles or whatever may not have considered this was a COVID symptom...yet precisely because they were sniffly or coughing slightly more than usual, they were also a more potent vector than had they been truly 100% symptom free.

So, you're departing from an absolute which, at the very least, is a strong candidate for being a false premise.

Here's a recent brief overview of asymptomaticity and transmission:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03141-3