#2535 April 03, 2021, 03:48:39 PM Last Edit: April 03, 2021, 03:53:33 PM by Caomhaoin
It's unconstitutional.

The only proviso is identifying as any group except white, so your point is null.

I can almost guarantee you, and even the writer for that bog roll media site put conditional disclaimers all over the place, that it's not unconstitutional, in the context of a health crisis that has to be dealt with at a population and not an individual level.

Quote from: Black Shepherd Carnage on April 03, 2021, 03:53:19 PM
I can almost guarantee you, and even the writer for that bog roll media site put conditional disclaimers all over the place, that it's not unconstitutional, in the context of a health crisis that has to be dealt with at a population and not an individual level.

Jaysus you can rarely see the wood from the trees. You are so indoctrinated, it's like interacting with a robot.


Quote from: Caomhaoin on April 03, 2021, 03:54:59 PM
Quote from: Black Shepherd Carnage on April 03, 2021, 03:53:19 PM
I can almost guarantee you, and even the writer for that bog roll media site put conditional disclaimers all over the place, that it's not unconstitutional, in the context of a health crisis that has to be dealt with at a population and not an individual level.

Jaysus you can rarely see the wood from the trees. You are so indoctrinated, it's like interacting with a robot.

From the article:

QuoteThat's Almost Certainly Unconstitutional.

Quotearbitrary, likely unconstitutional categories

In other words, it's almost certainly not unconstitutional in the context of the health crisis, but they're watching their own editorial backs while relying on the type of person who reads their rag to gloss over the qualifiers. Oh look, you did.


Quote from: Caomhaoin on April 03, 2021, 03:54:59 PM
Quote from: Black Shepherd Carnage on April 03, 2021, 03:53:19 PM
I can almost guarantee you, and even the writer for that bog roll media site put conditional disclaimers all over the place, that it's not unconstitutional, in the context of a health crisis that has to be dealt with at a population and not an individual level.

Jaysus you can rarely see the wood from the trees. You are so indoctrinated, it's like interacting with a robot.

Pretty much everything he said seemed rational and likely.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/vermont-vaccines-bipoc-people-front-line-opinion-2021-4%3famp

Yeah I read that one too.

It's contradicted by other articles that appeared on the first page of your google search.

QuoteWith a population of only 630,000 people, 94% of whom are white, there are only about 36,000 BIPOC people in Vermont.

Wow, didn't know that about Vermont. It really is going to make fuck all difference to the vaccine wait time for the average under 50, non-comorbid, non-occupational health risk white person then, isn't it? It's not like they were all going to get vaccinated within the next two weeks were it not for that pesky 5% non-white section of the population who are up first! And, in any case (where are you astfgyl?? this is your time to shine!!), the personal risk for anyone under 50 with no comorbidities is (c'mon astfgyl, where are you??), well, it's extremely fucking low is what I'm getting at, and any white people with comorbidities or an essential worker can already get vaccinated. If uptake among at risk BIPOC individuals in Vermont is low (which it is, very), then the best strategy to adopt to protect that community is to open it up to everyone and hope that you get high enough herd immunity numbers that way.

#2543 April 04, 2021, 11:28:18 PM Last Edit: April 04, 2021, 11:38:50 PM by Caomhaoin
You are missing the point entirely.

It's a proposal to roll out healthcare based on race, which is a dangerous, ridiculous precedent to set.

You're assuming that I gloss over things, which is a projection of your own legion of missteps which litter this board.

Read the 14th amendment and the civil rights act, make up your own mind (if you can).

A pandemic calls for population level not individual level strategy. A pandemic calls for population level not individual level strategy. A pandemic calls for population level not individual level strategy. A pandemic calls for population level not individual level strategy.

The 14th amendment ain't got shit to do with this unless you don't get the above. All at-risk populations are being targeted, by whatever means deemed necessary. Not at-risk populations therefore have a civic duty to try to understand this broader interest and not be precious little bitches. That's all straight out of my own mind.

Previous little bitches. For pointing out that one jumps to the front of the queue by simply IDENTIFYING as any kind of person other than a white person. Anything. You see no issue with that?

But sure it's just to flatten the curve! Nothing to see here!

As Stone Cold used to say, 'Jesus Christ son'.

#2546 April 05, 2021, 08:20:15 AM Last Edit: April 05, 2021, 08:22:28 AM by Black Shepherd Carnage
It's a vaccination strategy Kev, not the line for free ice creams ffs

Wait,  so what you're saying is they put the vaccine in the ice cream? If course! It's so simple!